This volume is mostly about character development, particularly Serenity encountering the Bible. In addition to this, her relationship with her mother develops and begins to improve. Her mother unfortunately still functions as a “Grr, I hate Christians” strawman, but this is likely to lessen as both of them change. If she is really a generically spiritual individual, however, one must wonder why she objects so strongly to her daughter’s pseudo-conversion. Considering that so far the change has been limited to tame moral issues, most people in her position would find it positive, even if they disapproved of the more conservative aspects of Christianity.
Ms. Baxter returns and reprises her role as Bad Influence and general butt of jokes. Her character aside, I have a problem with this mockery. The story would be much more complex (and realistic) if there was a non-Christian character who was honestly a decent person.
In regard to the humor, I find myself fairly neutral. Aside from one joke panel that succeeds because of raw cheese factor (featuring taped-in Sally) I didn’t find any of it funny, but I was able to skim past it mostly without annoyance. Given that I am a far cry from the target audience, I don’t know if this might be successful for others.
This volume also swerves abruptly into apologetics, though this topic is appropriate given Serenity’s encounter with the Bible. Prayer is addressed further and mostly superficially, but I’m willing to forgive this because the issue is rather difficult. Though Serenity might not follow skeptical lines of thought very far, at least she asks the questions. I found Pastor Calvin’s association of basic questions with a theology degree mildly disturbing, reminiscent of some anti-intellectual trends in American Christianity, but I won’t pursue an ambiguous issue.
Near the end of this volume things turn into a defense of the Bible against unfriendly criticism. Like most other discussions, this one is fairly brief and superficial. If it suggests to young readers that scriptural accuracy is an important concern but there are decent arguments for it, that’s fine. If it makes them think a few generic and unsupported statements are a defense of faith, that is significantly less than fine.
Like much of Serenity, these arguments have a triumphalist overtone, as if all these issues are simple and settled. I was uncomfortable with how blithely various objections were tossed aside (except perhaps concerning the Jesus Seminar). Worst, they use one of the most abused apologetic arguments: CS Lewis’s trilemma. It has some significance as the end of an argument that has established scriptural accuracy and certain theological points, but alone it is open to many critiques: there are obviously other logical possibilities than Lord-Lunatic-Liar.
Perhaps I have become more charitable during the reviewing gap, but the sixth volume of Serenity didn’t strike me as negatively as the others. Certain problems of dialogue and overall shallow pacing remain, but much of the content could be worse.
|